Some progressives are arguing for a religious right to abortion
The Supreme Court’s deference to faith-based objectors has buoyed their claims
The Book of Exodus contains a section about liability. It is a bit outdated, enumerating damages if someone’s bull gores another person’s slave. But one parable is relevant to abortion debates today, since it elucidates how Judaism understands the unborn. If a pregnant woman is hit and suffers a miscarriage, the perpetrator must pay a fine. If she dies, however, the penalty is death. The tale is said to differentiate between the value of a fetus and a person. Other Jewish texts also hold that life doesn’t begin at conception.
The justification for outlawing abortion is to protect fetal life; some states’ bans say this explicitly. Yet that rationale rests on a religious belief about when life begins. What about people whose faith maintains that it starts later? Indeed Jewish law authorises, and even requires, an abortion if a mother’s health—physical or mental—is jeopardised. Jews disagree about what degree of risk warrants the procedure. But the general principle is that her well-being takes priority.
Explore more
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Religious abortions"
United States November 18th 2023
- America’s government isn’t shutting down just yet
- The Supreme Court’s code of conduct is a good first step
- Higher wages are spurring innovation in dinner
- Some progressives are arguing for a religious right to abortion
- Inside a month of America’s school shootings
- An FBI investigation raises questions about Eric Adams
- Why America struggles to make friends abroad
More from United States
Joe Biden is practising some Clintonian politics
But he needs to do more than crack down on “junk fees” to woo swing voters
A surprising Japanese presence in a traditional American craft
Quilting connects continents