Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 22 March 2019
Sec. Plant Biophysics and Modeling
This article is part of the Research Topic Plant Movements: The Principles of Non-Muscular Deformations and Their Biomimetic Potential View all 5 articles

The Structure and Occurrence of a Velum in Utricularia Traps (Lentibulariaceae)

Bartosz J. P&#x;achno
Bartosz J. Płachno1*Piotr 
wi&#x;tekPiotr Świątek2Vitor F. O. MirandaVitor F. O. Miranda3Piotr StolarczykPiotr Stolarczyk4
  • 1Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Cracow, Poland
  • 2Department of Animal Histology and Embryology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
  • 3Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal, Departamento de Biologia Aplicada à Agropecuária, UNESP–Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 4Unit of Botany and Plant Physiology, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Cracow, Poland

Bladderworts (Utricularia, Lentibulariaceae, Lamiales) are carnivorous plants that form small suction traps (bladders) for catching invertebrates. The velum is a cuticle structure that is produced by specialized trichomes of the threshold pavement epithelium. It is believed that the velum together with the mucilage seals the free edge of the trap door and that it is necessary for correct functioning of the trap. However, recently, some authors have questioned the occurrence of a velum in the traps of the Utricularia from the various sections. The main aim of this study was to confirm whether velum occurs in the traps of the Utricularia species from the subgenera Polypompholyx, Bivalvaria, and Utricularia. The 15 species were examined from subg. Polypompholyx, subg. Bivalvaria, and subg. Utricularia. A velum was found in all examined Utricularia species. In the traps of the members of section Pleiochasia, there was an outer velum (forming a complete ring) and an inner velum. In the traps of Utricularia uniflora (Lasiocaules), there was only an inner velum. In these species, the formation of the velum was accompanied by intensive mucilage production, and as a result, when door was closed (set position), the mucilage and the velum touched the surface of the door. In members of both sections of Pleiochasia and Lasiocaules, the pavement epithelium had a more complicated structure (four to five zones) than in the members of the subgenera Bivalvaria and Utricularia in which three distinct zones occurred (an outer with a velum, a middle and an internal with the mucilage trichomes). Even in U. purpurea, where the threshold was a reduced pavement epithelium, it consisted of three functional zones and the presence of a velum. Two main types of velum have been proposed. A velum was present in Utricularia traps regardless of the trap type or the habitat (aquatic, epiphytic, and terrestrial species). We proposed broad definition of velum as cuticle membranes covered by mucilage; from a functional point of view, this definition is more useful and more reflects complexity of this structure.

Introduction

Bladderworts (Utricularia spp., Lentibulariaceae, Lamiales) have suction traps (“bladders”) for catching invertebrates (i.e., Mette et al., 2000; Alkhalaf et al., 2009; Płachno et al., 2014, 2015; Darnowski et al., 2018; Płachno and Muravnik, 2018), and sometimes, also for bacteria and protozoa cultures (Sirová et al., 2009, 2018; Płachno et al., 2012). They are considered to be the fastest predators in the plant kingdom (Vincent and Marmottant, 2011; Adamec, 2011a,b, 2012; Vincent et al., 2011a,b; Poppinga et al., 2013, 2016, 2017). The Utricularia trap is a small hollow bladder with a trap entrance (Figure 1A). The lower part of the trap entrance is termed the threshold. This massive, collar-like structure has an agglomeration of tightly packed glandular trichomes on the surface of its middle region (Figures 1A,B). This agglomeration of trichomes is called the pavement epithelium (for a detailed description of the threshold structure see Lloyd, 1942; Poppinga et al., 2016).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The general structure of the trap and velum of Utricularia novae-zelandiae. (A) SEM image of a longitudinal section of an Utricularia novae-zelandiae trap: the threshold with the pavement epithelium (star), door (d); scale bar = 1 mm. (B) A longitudinal section of a Utricularia novae-zelandiae trap entrance, note the outer velum (white ellipse, this part is zoomed in Figure 2C) and inner velum (black ellipse); scale bar = 100 μm. (C) The outer velum, note the honeycomb-like structure of the velum; scale bar = 50 μm. (D) Differential interference contrast microscopy; Utricularia novae-zelandiae trap entrance, note the outer velum (white eclipse); scale bar = 50 μm. (E) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold of the external part showing the trichomes that produce the external velum; scale bar = 20 μm. (F) View of a trap entrance showing the ring of the velum (white circle); scale bar = 200 μm.

Lloyd (1942) recognized three zones in the pavement epithelium: outer, middle, and inner in the traps of Utricularia vulgaris. The trichomes from all of the zones have ruptured cuticles. However, the cuticles of the trichomes of the outer zone are very well developed and form balloon-like structures, which together form the velum. Moreover, the cuticles of the trichomes from the middle zone are attached to the cuticles of the trichomes from the outer zone and participate in forming the velum. According to this author, the velum forms a valve that seals the free edge of the trap door. Lloyd (1932a) did an experiment and cut the velum. The traps without a velum could not reset. Thus, the occurrence of a velum is necessary for correct functioning of a trap.

It should be stressed that Lloyd (1942) observed a velum in the traps of various Utricularia species (also in members of Polypompholyx), regardless of the trap types or the habitat: aquatic, epiphytic, and terrestrial species. According to him, in the traps of Utricularia monanthos and related species (section Pleiochasia), there is an outer and inner velum. The velum in this type of trap forms a complete massive ring (see Lloyd, 1942).

The structure of the pavement epithelium and the velum was later analyzed by Broussaud and Vintejoux (1982) (U. vulgaris L., Utricularia australis R.Br.), Fineran (1985: U. monanthos Hook.f., which is treated by some authors as a synonym of Utricularia dichotoma Labill.), and Heide-Jørgensen (1989, 1991: Utricularia sandersonii Oliv., U. australis, Utricularia reniformis A.St-Hil., U. subulata L.), who used transmission electron microscopy. Fineran (1985) proposed that a well-developed velum is a character of the U. vulgaris type of trap and that this might represent an advanced structural feature that is connected with the position of door against the threshold. According to him, the concept of a velum in traps other than those of the U. vulgaris type should be studied in more detail. Thurston and Seabury (1975) studied trap morphology of Utricularia gibba (= Utricularia biflora) and proposed that mucilage-like substances composed the velum. However, they used only scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reaction.

Recently, the scientific team of Simon Poppinga (Westermeier et al., 2017) investigated the trap biomechanics in 19 Utricularia species in order to determine any correlations between the life-forms, trapping mechanisms, and functional morphological traits. Although these authors observed a velum in the traps of U. gibba L. (sect. Utricularia) and Utricularia resupinata B.D.Greene ex Bigelow (sect. Lecticula), they questioned the occurrence of a velum in the traps of Utricularia species from the sections: Polypompholyx (Utricularia multifida R.Br.), Pleiochasia (Utricularia uniflora R.Br., U. dichotoma, Utricularia menziesii R.Br.), Nigrescentes (Utricularia warburgii K.I.Goebel), Calpidisca (Utricularia welwitschii Oliv., Utricularia livida E.Mey.), Stomoisia (Utricularia cornuta Michx.), Oligocista (Utricularia prehensilis E.Mey), Foliosa (Utricularia calycifida Benj., Utricularia praelonga A.St-Hil. and Girard), Orchidioides (Utricularia alpina Jacq., Utricularia reniformis A.St-Hil.), Setiscapella (Utricularia flaccida A.DC.), and Steyermarkia (Utricularia aureomaculata Steyerm).

In some species (U. welwitschii, U. livida, U. cornuta, U. praelonga, U. reniformis, U. aureomaculata), Westermeier et al. (2017) observed a structure at the outer zone of pavement epithelium, which they interpreted as an accumulation of mucilage. These authors proposed the absence of a velum in the members of sections Polypompholyx, Pleiochasia, Nigrescentes, Calpidisca, Stomoisia, Oligocista, Foliosa, Orchidioides, Setiscapella, and Steyermarkia. Thus, the results of Westermeier et al. (2017) are contradictory to the observations that were made by Lloyd (1942), Heide-Jørgensen (1989, 1991) and Reifenrath et al. (2006). The different opinions even concern the same species (i.e., U. multifida, U. dichotoma, and U. reniformis).

The main aim of this study was to test whether a velum is a common feature in the traps of Utricularia across a wide range of species and to explore differences and commonalities in trap morphology between species, with a focus on the region at and near the velum. Due to the fact that most authors consider the velum to be well developed in the trap of U. vulgaris, the Utricularia reflexa Oliv. (sect. Utricularia) was selected as the reference to other species.

Additionally, the general structure of the pavement epithelium among the species from various sections was studied and discussed.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

The list of examined species with infra-generic classification in Utricularia was presented in Table 1. The plant material was obtained from the Botanic Garden of Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland), the collection of Kamil Pásek (Ostrava, Czech Republic, http://www.bestcarnivorousplants.net/), the collection of the Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences at Treboň (Czech Republic), the collection of Dr. Corin Gardiner (New Zealand), and the collection of Mateusz Wrazidło (Poland). Approximately 10 or more traps were examined for each species.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The list of examined species with infra-generic classification in Utricularia. according Taylor (1989) and Silva et al. (2018).

Methods

The traps were examined using light microscopy (LM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as follows. The traps were fixed in a mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde with 2.5% formaldehyde in a 0.05M cacodylate buffer (Sigma; pH 7.2) overnight or for several days, washed three times in a 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and post-fixed in a 1% osmium tetroxide solution at room temperature for 1.5 h. These were followed by dehydration using a graded ethanol series, infiltration and embedding using an epoxy embedding medium kit (Fluka). Following polymerization at 60°C, sections were cut at 70 nm for the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Leica ultracut UCT ultramicrotome, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Reynolds, 1963) and examined using a Hitachi H500 transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 75 kV.

Semi-thin sections (0.9–1.0 μm thick) were prepared for LM and stained for general histology using aqueous methylene blue/azure II (MB/AII) for 1–2 min (Humphrey and Pittman, 1974) and examined using an Olympus BX60 light microscope. Additionally, fresh, non-fixed traps were cut and examined using an Olympus BX60 light microscope. The periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reaction was also used to reveal the presence of insoluble polysaccharides, and Sudan Black B (SBB) was used to detect the presence of lipids and cuticle material (Jensen, 1962). Staining for total proteins was performed using mercuric bromophenol blue (Mazia et al., 1953). For the SEM, the representative floral parts were fixed (as above or in ethanol in the case of U. tubulata) and later dehydrated and subjected to critical-point drying using liquid CO2. They were then sputter-coated with gold and examined at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV using a Hitachi S-4,700 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), which is housed in the Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University in Kraków).

Results

Section Pleiochasia (U. novae-zelandiae, U. volubilis, U. dichotoma, and U. tubulata)

In all of the species that were examined, most of the glandular trichomes in the exterior pavement epithelium produced the cuticle that formed the velum (zone 1; Figures 1BF, 3A). According to the terminology of Lloyd (1942), this velum is the “outer velum.” This velum was also formed by the cuticles of the terminal cells of the trichomes that occurred at the front of the door. The velum was honeycomb-shaped (Figure 1E). This outer velum formed a complete ring (Figure 1F). The cuticles that formed the velum were stained with Sudan Black B (Figure 2B). In the next zone of the pavement epithelium (zone 2), there were trichomes with terminal cells, which did not touch the terminal cells of the neighboring trichomes (only their cuticles were connected). These trichomes produced mucilage (Figures 2C,D). In zone 3, the terminal cell of the trichomes produced mucilage and had prominent ruptured cuticles that formed the “inner velum” (Figures 1B, 2A). The cuticles that formed the inner velum were stained with Sudan Black B (Figure 2E). When the door was closed (set position), the mucilage and cuticles from the pavement epithelium trichomes touched the surface of the door (Figures 2A,CE). Zone 4 was formed by trichomes that were closely packed, and therefore, their terminal cells touched each other (Figure 2A). There were mucilage trichomes in zone 5 that were less closely packed compared to the trichomes from zone 4 (Figure 2A). This difference was very well visible in the traps of U. volubilis (Figure 3B) and U. dichotoma but was less prominent in the U. novae-zelandiae traps.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Structure and cytochemistry of the pavement epithelium of Utricularia dichotoma. (A) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold showing the zones of the pavement epithelium: zone 1 (I) with an outer velum, zone 2 (II), zone 3 (III) with an inner velum, zone 4 (IV), zone 5 with mucilage trichomes (V), door (d), door mucilage trichomes (m), bifids (b); the sub-region marked by white box was shown in higher magnification at (B), the sub-region marked by black box was shown in higher magnification at (C,D); scale bar = 50 μm. (B) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold of the external part showing the trichomes that produce the outer velum (white ellipse). The lipid stain SBB was absorbed by the cuticles; scale bar = 20 μm. (C) A semi-thin longitudinal section of part of the threshold showing zone 3 of the pavement epithelium with the trichomes that produce the inner velum (circle); scale bar = 20 μm. (D) The same as in C but after the PAS reaction, note the intensive mucilage production in zones 1 (II) and 3 (III) of the pavement epithelium, and also the mucilage trichomes on the surface of the door (m); scale bar = 20 μm. (E) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the part of the threshold showing zone 3 of the pavement epithelium with the trichomes that produce the inner velum (circle). The lipid stain SBB was absorbed by the cuticles; scale bar = 20 μm.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The structure of the pavement epithelium of the Utricularia species; sections Pleiochasia and Lasiocaules. (A) A longitudinal section of a Utricularia tubulata trap entrance, note the outer velum (white ellipse) and the zones of the pavement epithelium, door (d); scale bar = 200 μm. (B) U. volubilis A semi-thin longitudinal section of part of the threshold showing zone 4 (IV) and zone 5 with mucilage trichomes (V); scale bar = 20 μm. (C) A longitudinal section of a Utricularia uniflora trap entrance, threshold (T), door (d); scale bar = 50 μm. (D) SEM image of a longitudinal section of a Utricularia uniflora trap entrance, note the lack of an outer velum, door (d); scale bar = 50 μm.

Section Lasiocaules (U. uniflora)

The species in this section had no “outer velum.” In the exterior part of the pavement epithelium, there were glandular trichomes with terminal cells, which did not touch the terminal cells of the neighboring trichomes, only their ruptured cuticles were connected (zone 1, this zone corresponded to zone 2 in the section Pleiochasia) (Figures 3C,D). The terminal cells of these trichomes had ruptured cuticles (Figure 4A). In the next zone of the pavement epithelium–the terminal cells of the trichomes produced mucilage and had prominent ruptured cuticles (zone 2) (Figure 4A). The cuticles of the neighboring trichomes were connected and formed the velum, which stained with Sudan Black B (Figure 4B). When the door was closed (set position), the mucilage and cuticles from the pavement epithelium trichomes touched the surface of the door (Figures 4B,C). In the interior part of the pavement epithelium (curved part of threshold), the trichomes were closely packed, and therefore their terminal cells touched each other (zone 3). These trichomes did not have a very prominent ruptured cuticle in the terminal cells. The trichomes that were in the most interior part of the pavement epithelium (zone 4) produced a large amount of mucilage, which was well visible after using the aqueous methylene blue/azure II stain (Figure 4A) and after the PAS reaction (Figure 4C).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The structure and cytochemistry of the pavement epithelium of Utricularia uniflora, the structure of the pavement epithelium of the Utricularia species; section Calpidisca. (A) A longitudinal section of the pavement epithelium of Utricularia uniflora, note the velum (ellipse); scale bar = 20 μm. (B) Utricularia uniflora, a semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold of the external part showing the trichomes that produce the velum. The lipid stain SBB was absorbed by the cuticles (ellipse); scale bar = 20 μm. (C) PAS reaction, note the intensive production of mucilage in zones I. II and IV of the pavement epithelium, and also the mucilage trichomes on the surface of the door (m), door (d); scale bar = 20 μm. (D) SEM image of a longitudinal section of a Utricularia sandersonii trap entrance, note the external zone (I) in which the trichomes produce velum (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes; scale bar = 50 μm. (E) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the pavement epithelium of Utricularia sandersonii, note the three zones of the pavement epithelium (I, II, III), the velum (ellipse); scale bar = 20 μm. (F) SEM image of a longitudinal section of Utricularia livida, note the external zone (I) in which the trichomes produce the velum (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes, door (d); scale bar = 50 μm.

Section Calpidisca (U. sandersonii, U. livida)

There were three distinct zones in the pavement epithelium (Figures 4DF): an external zone (1) in which the trichomes produced the velum (about four rows of trichomes), a middle zone (2) with trichomes that had flattened terminal cells, and an internal zone (3) that had mucilage trichomes. The trichomes of the internal zone produced a large amount of mucilage, which was well visible in both the semi-thin sections (Figure 4E) and the SEM picture (Figures 4D,F). All of the trichomes of the pavement epithelium had a ruptured cuticle of terminal cells. The velum formed a valve that touched the free edge of the trap door (Figure 4E). In the front of the pavement epithelium, there were long-stalked glands, which produced a large amount of mucilage (Figures 4DF).

Section Oligocista (U. prehensilis) and Section Foliosa (U. calycifida, Utricularia tricolor)

In the pavement epithelium, there were three distinct zones (Figures 5AE): an external zone in which the trichomes produced velum (Figures 5A,B), a middle zone with trichomes that had flattened terminal cells and an internal zone with mucilage trichomes. The cuticles that formed the velum were stained with Sudan Black B (Figure 5B). The velum that was formed by the glands from the external zone had a membrane-like structure (Figure 5C) or a honeycomb-like structure (Figure 5F), and the apexes of the glandular cells were visible. In the front of the pavement epithelium, there were sessile glands that produced a large amount of mucilage (Figures 5C,F).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Structure of the pavement epithelium and velum of Utricularia species; section Oligocista (U. prehensilis) and section Foliosa (U. calycifida, U. tricolor). (A) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the pavement epithelium of Utricularia prehensilis; the velum (ellipse); scale bar = 20 μm. (B) U. prehensilis, a semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold of the external part showing the trichomes that produce the velum (ellipse). The lipid stain SBB was absorbed by the cuticles and the lateral walls of the barrier cells; scale bar = 20 μm. (C) Utricularia calycifida, scanning electron microscope image of the pavement epithelium, note the velum that covers zone one (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes and the sessile mucilage trichomes at the front of the pavement epithelium (m); scale bar = 40 μm. (D) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the pavement epithelium of Utricularia calycifida, note the three zones of the pavement epithelium (I, II, III), the velum (circle); scale bar = 20 μm. (E) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the pavement epithelium of Utricularia tricolor, note the three zones of the pavement epithelium (I, II, III), the velum (circle); scale bar = 20 μm. (F) Utricularia prehensilis, SEM image of the pavement epithelium, note the honeycomb-like velum (ellipse); scale bar = 50 μm.

Section Orchidioides (U. alpina, U. nelumbifolia, U. humboldtii)

In the pavement epithelium, there were three distinct zones: an external zone in which the trichomes produced the velum (zone 1), a middle zone with trichomes that had flattened terminal cells and an internal zone that had mucilage trichomes (Figures 6AD). The velum was formed by the cuticles of the most external pavement trichomes and connected with the cuticles of the more internal trichomes. Thus, a balloon-like structure was formed (Figures 6AC). In U. nelumbifolia, the velum was colonized by bacteria (Figure 6D). In the front of the pavement epithelium, there were mucilage trichomes (Figures 6AD).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Structure of the pavement epithelium and velum of Utricularia species; section Orchidioides (Utricularia alpina, Utricularia nelumbifolia, Utricularia humboldtii) and section Utricularia (U. reflexa). (A) Utricularia alpina, SEM image of the pavement epithelium, note the velum that covers zone one (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes and the sessile mucilage trichomes at the front of the pavement epithelium (m), trigger bristles (Tg); scale bar = 30 μm. (B) Utricularia humboldtii, SEM image of the pavement epithelium, note the velum (ellipse), zone one (I), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes and the sessile mucilage trichomes at the front of the pavement epithelium (m), door (d); scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Utricularia nelumbifolia, SEM image of the pavement epithelium, note the velum that covers zone one (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes, trap door (d); scale bar = 50 μm. (D) Utricularia nelumbifolia, a semi-thin longitudinal section of the pavement epithelium, note the three zones of the pavement epithelium (I, II, III), the velum (circle), trap door (d), the mucilage trichomes (m); scale bar = 20 μm. (E) Utricularia reflexa, SEM image of the pavement epithelium, note the velum (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes (asterisk) and the mucilage trichomes at the front of the pavement epithelium (m), bifids (b); scale bar = 200 μm. (F) Utricularia reflexa, a semi-thin longitudinal section of part of the pavement epithelium, note the zones of pavement epithelium (I, II), the velum (ellipse); scale bar = 20 μm.

Section Utricularia (U. reflexa)

In the pavement epithelium, there were three distinct zones: an external zone (1), a middle zone (2), and an internal zone that had mucilage glands (3) (Figures 6E,F and Figures 7A,B). The velum was primarily formed by the cuticles of the external zone trichomes and was a balloon-like structure (Figure 6F). It covered the external zone in a fixed material (Figures 6E,F and Figures 7A,B). The velum continued with the cuticles of the middle zone trichomes–this part looked like a honeycomb (Figure 7B). The cuticles that formed the velum stained very deeply with Sudan Black B (Figure 8A), but only weakly after the PAS reaction (Figure 8B). Staining for total proteins did not reveal any proteins in the velum (only bacteria were stained) (Figure 8C). In the front of the pavement epithelium, there were long-stalked pyriform glands that produced a large amount of mucilage (Figures 7B, 8B).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Structure of the pavement epithelium and velum of Utricularia reflexa. (A) A semi-thin longitudinal section of the pavement epithelium, note all of the zones of the pavement epithelium (I, II, III), the velum (ellipse); scale bar = 50 μm. (B) A SEM image of the pavement epithelium, note the velum (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes (asterisk) and the stalked mucilage trichomes at the front of the pavement epithelium (sm), bifids (b); scale bar = 200 μm.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Staining of the pavement epithelium and velum of Utricularia reflexa and U. purpurea. (A) Utricularia reflexa, a semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold of the external part showing the trichomes that produce the velum (ellipse). The lipid stain SBB was absorbed by the cuticles and lateral walls of the barrier cells; scale bar = 20 μm. (B) Utricularia reflexa, PAS reaction, note the pink colouration of the velum (ellipse) and the very intensive mucilage production by the stalked trichomes (m); scale bar = 20 μm. (C) Utricularia reflexa, staining for total proteins noted no proteins in the velum (ellipse) but a positive staining of the bacteria and cytoplasm of the cells of the pavement epithelium trichomes; scale bar = 20 μm. (D) Utricularia purpurea, a SEM image of the pavement epithelium, note the velum (ellipse), the middle zone (II) and the internal zone (III) with the mucilage trichomes and the sessile mucilage trichomes at the front of the pavement epithelium (m); scale bar = 50 μm.

Section Vesiculina (U. purpurea)

The pavement epithelium was smaller than that in U. reflexa. In the pavement epithelium, there were three distinct zones: an external zone in which the trichomes produced velum, a middle, and an internal zone with mucilage trichomes (Figure 8D). The cuticles of the trichomes from both the middle and internal zones were connected and formed a honeycomb-like structure, and therefore, the terminal trichome cells were visible (Figure 8D).

Ultrastructure Data (U. dichotoma, U. uniflora, U. prehensilis, U. nelumbifolia, U. reflexa)

The velum consisted of cuticles (Figures 9AI) that were formed by the terminal cells and also the middle (barrier) cells of the trichomes (Figure 9C). There was mucilage that had the character of fine fibers (i.e., U. dichotoma, U. uniflora Figures 9B,D,E) or granules that were on the surface of the velum (i.e., U. reflexa. Figure 9I) in some of the cuticles. A large amount of mucilage was observed in U. dichotoma and U. uniflora (Figures 9B,D,E). The surface of the velum was colonized by bacteria in some of the species (Figures 9H,I).

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Ultrastructure of the velum and pavement epithelium trichomes. (A) An external velum (arrow) ultrastructure of Utricularia dichotoma; this part of the velum was formed by the cuticles of the threshold trichomes; scale bar = 1.92 μm. (B) External velum (arrow) ultrastructure of Utricularia dichotoma, note the mucilage (M); scale bar = 1.92 μm. (C) Ultrastructure of the pavement epithelium trichomes of Utricularia dichotoma, note that the velum was formed by the cuticles (asterisk) of the terminal cells (T) and also the middle (barrier) cells of the trichomes (e); scale bar = 3.66 μm. (D) Ultrastructure of the velum (arrow) and pavement epithelium trichomes of Utricularia uniflora, note the mucilage (M); scale bar = 4 μm. (E) Velum (arrow) ultrastructure of Utricularia uniflora, note the mucilage (M); scale bar = 3.14 μm. (F,G) Velum (arrow) formation in Utricularia prehensilis, note that mucilage was also secreted; scale bar = 3.6 μm and bar = 2.55 μm. (H) Velum (arrow) ultrastructure of Utricularia nelumbifolia, note the bacteria (star); scale bar = 3 μm. (I) Velum (arrow) ultrastructure of Utricularia reflexa, note the bacteria (star); scale bar = 2.55 μm.

Discussion

Regarding the occurrence of velum, our results support the observations of Lloyd (1932b, 1942, see Supplementary Material 1), Heide-Jørgensen (1989, 1991), Richter (1990) and Reifenrath et al. (2006). Proper techniques and various methods were essential to show that there exists a wide range of velum morphologies across Utricularia species. It should be highlighted that the method of preparing the specimen may affect some features that they cannot be clearly identified. For example, absence of a velum might be a methodological artifact because only SEM was used and this did not allow distinction between mucilage and cuticles. Even Lloyd wrote “The presence of this veil has been hitherto overlooked; indeed, I have overlooked it myself for years. It is only with great care that sections can be cut (of fresh material, of course) without tearing it away.” (Lloyd, 1929, p. 93). So, light microscopy, cytochemical staining and TEM allow good visibility of important trap features (allowed to distinguish the mucilage material from the cuticles) and clearly increase our current understanding of trap anatomy, such as the fact that there exists a wide range of velum morphologies across Utricularia species. Using good-quality thin sections, staining and TEM, it is clearly evident that both a velum (which is consisted of cuticle) and mucilage are produced by the glandular pavement epithelium trichomes in the Utricularia species from all three subgenera: Polypompholyx (sections Pleiochasia and Lasiocaules), Bivalvaria, and Utricularia.

However, it should be highlighted that some authors e.g., Broussaud and Vintejoux (1982) were not completely sure about their definition/interpretation of the notion “velum” as compared to Lloyd’s usage of the term “velum.” Probably, Westermeier et al. (2017) preferred a narrow definition of velum (velum which occurs in Utricularia vulgaris trap types). Fineran (1985) hypothesized that the pavement epithelium and velum in U. monanthos (section Pleiochasia) were different compared to those in the trap type of U. vulgaris. Also Richter (1990) found differences with respect of the velum morphology between Utricularia cf. praelonga and U. dichotoma.

According to Lloyd (1932b, 1942) and this study in Utricularia species from section Pleiochasia (Lloyd’s Utricularia hookeri trap type), there is a double velum: an outer and inner velum. The outer velum is not only formed of the cuticles of trichomes of the pavement epithelium but also of the cuticles of the other trichomes of the threshold. Interestingly, in the U. uniflora trap, there is an absence of the threshold trichomes that form the outer velum. Jobson et al. (2017, 2018) classified this species to a new section Lasiocaules. It should be determined whether this character also occurs in other species from this section, which could be an important synapomorphy to add support to this monophyletic section.

After analyzing the velum structure in various Utricularia representatives, two main types of velum could be recognized; however, there are also transitional types. The first type, a velum with a balloon-like structure in which the apexes of the terminal cells are not visible (they are covered by the velum) in the part of the velum that is produced by the trichomes of the external part of the pavement epithelium. Most of the velum is formed by a continuous membrane that has no openings (Figure 7B). Outlines of individual fragments of the cuticles that form the velum are visible on the surface of the velum. This type of velum is a characteristic of the members of the section Utricularia. The velum in the section Orchidioides is very similar to the first type, but some apexes of the terminal cells may be visible in the part of the velum that is produced by the trichomes of the external part of the pavement epithelium (e.g., Figure 6A). In the second type, the velum structure is honeycomb shaped (Figure 1E). This type of velum is a characteristic of the members of the subg. Polypompholyx. This type structure of velum enables the production of a large amount of mucilage by the trichomes. Thus, a complex structure is formed (cuticles + mucilage). A modified honeycomb-like velum occurs in some of the Utricularia species of the subg. Bivalvaria (Figure 5F) but with less mucilage being produced by the trichomes from zone 1.

In the members of both sections Pleiochasia and Lasiocaules, the pavement epithelium had a more complicated structure (four to five zones) than in the members of the subgenera Bivalvaria and Utricularia in which three distinct zones occurred (an outer zone with the main zone of velum production, a middle zone, and an internal zone that had mucilage trichomes). Even in U. purpurea, in which the threshold was smaller (“rudimentary threshold” according to Reifenrath et al., 2006), the pavement epithelium consisted of three functional zones and there was a velum. Broussaud and Vintejoux (1982) recognized four zones in the pavement epithelium in the traps of U. vulgaris, U. australis; however, they considered ultrastructure details, e.g., the occurrence of cell wall ingrowths, which have not been not studied or considered in this research. According to a phylogenetic perspective, the pavement epithelium with four to five functional zones supports the clade of subg. Polypompholyx, while that with three zones occurs in the Bivalvaria + Utricularia clade (Figure 10). Thus, this character can be important for the phylogeny of the Utricularia lineages, bringing also support to the infrageneric classification. But, a wider sampling of species will be important to figure out the plesiomorphic state, thus to propose a hypothesis whether the three-zone epithelium is the ancestral state or originated by a reduction. The development of the velum deserves further detailed research, especially due to the fact that there is enormous diversity in Utricularia traps. Lloyd (1932b) recognized 15 main types of Utricularia traps that differ in various features such as the trap entrances, the occurrence of glandular trichomes and the trap vascular system (e.g., Lloyd, 1931, 1932a,b, 1942; Reifenrath et al., 2006; Płachno et al., 2017).

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. Phylogenetic hypothesis for the pavement epithelium (states: 3 zones or 4–5 zones) for Utricularia lineages. The topology was adapted from Jobson et al. (2017), Rodrigues et al. (2017), and Silva et al. (2018).

Westermeier et al. (2017) made important suggestion that the large amounts of mucilage in the entrance of traps with narrow-angled doors in the tubular trap entrances seal and fasten the oblique door. Therefore, the door in the traps of non-aquatic Utricularia is less susceptible to mechanical disturbances, which might be an advantage when the traps are not constantly surrounded by water. The production of mucilage by the trichomes of the pavement epithelium was found in all of the species that were examined here (both aquatic and terrestrial species). Mucilage was also produced by the trichomes that were in front of the pavement epithelium in the Utricularia species of the subg. Bivalvaria (Figures 5CF) and the subg. Utricularia (Figures 6A,B, 7B, 8B, Heide-Jørgensen, 1989; Juniper et al., 1989). So mucilage helps velum to seal the door tip against the threshold.

The velum was considered to be a structure that consisted of the cuticles of the terminal cells of the trichomes (Lloyd, 1942; Heide-Jørgensen, 1991). Here, it is shown that the velum is not only formed by the cuticles of the terminal cells but also by the cuticles of the middle (barrier) cells of the trichomes. So the Lloyd (1942) definition of term “velum” is: velum–the cuticle structure which is produced by cells of pavement epithelium trichomes and forms membrane to help sealing the trap door. However, in TEM, we showed that cuticle membrane was covered by mucilage; thus, we propose a broad definition of velum as cuticle membranes covered by mucilage from the pavement epithelium trichomes touching the surface of the door in set position and also seals the trap door in resting reset state and, thus, it maintains the produced negative pressure necessary for trap firing and functioning.

Conclusions

A velum occurs in the Utricularia traps regardless of the trap type or the habitat (aquatic, epiphytic, and terrestrial species). The results obtained here confirmed the observation of Francis Lloyd about the occurrence of a velum; however, we proposed broad definition of velum as cuticle membranes covered by mucilage. From a functional point of view, this definition is more useful and more reflects complexity of this structure. The finding of distinct velum structures in traps in all 15 Utricularia species studied supports the view that all these generic sections do produce negative pressure inside their traps and are thus able to fire and capture prey.

Data Availability

All datasets generated for this study are included in the manuscript and/or the Supplementary Files.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript. BP conducted study, analysed data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented, corrected and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported financially by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland as part of the statutory activities of Department of Animal Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice and also of the Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University in Kraków.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We dedicate our paper to good friend Dr. Lubomír Adamec (Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic), who studied aquatic carnivorous plants for many years. We are grateful to Prof. Małgorzata Stpiczyńska and Dr. Danuta Urbańska-Jasik for their kind assistance and also to Kamil Pásek, Corin Gardiner, and Mateusz Wrazidło for the material from their collections.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00302/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1 | Comparison of Lloyd’s Utricularia trap (1942) drawings with our documentation; the same structures are marked by eclipses. (A) Section of Utricularia monanthos trap entrance; the outer velum (red ellipse), the inner velum (green ellipse). (B) Utricularia dichotoma, a semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold showing the outer velum (red ellipse), the inner velum (green ellipse); scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Utricularia monanthos, trap opening is guarded by the outer velum (red ellipse). (D) Utricularia novae-zelandiae, view of a trap entrance showing the ring of the velum (red circle); scale bar = 200 μm. (E) Transverse selection of the threshold showing velum (red ellipse) of Utricularia vulgaris trap type. (F) Utricularia reflexa, a semi-thin longitudinal section of the threshold showing velum (red ellipse); scale bar = 50 μm.

References

Adamec, L. (2011a). The comparison of mechanically stimulated and spontaneous firings in traps of aquatic carnivorous Utricularia species. Aquat. Bot. 94, 44–49. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adamec, L. (2011b). Functional characteristics of traps of aquatic carnivorous Utricularia species. Aquat. Bot. 95, 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adamec, L. (2012). Firing and resetting characteristics of carnivorous Utricularia reflexa traps: physiological or only physical regulation of trap triggering? Phyton 52, 281–290.

Google Scholar

Alkhalaf, I. A., Hübener, T., and Porembski, S. (2009). Prey spectra of aquatic Utricularia species (Lentibulariaceae) in northeastern Germany: the role of planktonic algae. Flora - Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 204, 700–708. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2008.09.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Broussaud, F., and Vintejoux, C. (1982). Etudes ultrastructurales et cytochimiques des tissus superficiels placés à l’entrée des urnes d’Utricularia (Lentibulariacées). Bull. Soc. Bot., Lettres Bot, France 129, 191–20l.

Google Scholar

Darnowski, D., Bauer, U., Méndez, M., Horner, J., and Płachno, B. J. (2018). “Prey selection and specialization by carnivorous plants” in Carnivorous plants: Physiology, ecology, and evolution. eds. A. M. Ellison and L. Adamec (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 285–293. ISBN: 978019877984

Google Scholar

Fineran, B. A. (1985). Glandular trichomes in Utricularia: a review of their structure and function. Israel J. Bot. 34, 295–330.

Google Scholar

Heide-Jørgensen, H. S. (1989). Kødædende planter 3. Nat. Verden 9, 337–357.

Google Scholar

Heide-Jørgensen, H. S. (1991). Cuticle development and ultrastructure: evidence for a procuticle of high osmium affinity. Planta 183, 511–519. doi: 10.1007/BF00194272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Humphrey, C., and Pittman, G. (1974). A simple methylene blue-azure II-basic fuchsin for epoxy-embedded tissue sections. Stain. Technol. 49, 9–14.

Google Scholar

Jensen, W. A. (1962). Botanical histochemistry–principles and practice. University of California, Berkeley: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Google Scholar

Jobson, R. W., Baleeiro, P. C., and Guisande, C. (2018). “Systematics and evolution of Lentibulariaceae: III. Utricularia” in Carnivorous plants: Physiology, ecology, and evolution. eds. A. M. Ellison and L. Adamec (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 89–104. ISBN: 978019877984

Google Scholar

Jobson, R. W., Baleeiro, P. C., and Reut, M. (2017). Molecular phylogeny of subgenus Polypompholyx (Utricularia; Lentibulariaceae) based on three plastid markers: diversification and proposal for a new section. Aust. Syst. Bot. 30, 259–278. doi: 10.1071/SB17003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Juniper, B. E., Robins, R. J., and Joel, D. M. (1989). The carnivorous plants. London: Academic.

Google Scholar

Lloyd, F. E. (1929). The mechanism of the water tight door of the Utricularia trap. Plant Physiol. 4, 87–102. doi: 10.1104/pp.4.1.87

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lloyd, F. E. (1931). The range of structural and functional variation in the traps of Utricularia. Flora 25, 260–276.

Google Scholar

Lloyd, F. E. (1932a). The door of Utricularia, an irritable mechanism. Can. J. Bot. 10, 780–786.

Google Scholar

Lloyd, F. E. (1932b). The range of structural and functional variety in the traps of Utricularia and Polypompholyx. Flora 126, 303–328.

Google Scholar

Lloyd, F. E. (1942). The carnivorous plants. Waltham, Massachusetts: Chronica Botanica Company, Donald Publishing.

Google Scholar

Mazia, D., Brewer, P. A., and Alfert, M. (1953). The cytochemical staining and measurement of protein with mercuric bromophenol blue. Biol. Bull. 104, 57–67. doi: 10.2307/1538691

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mette, N., Wilbert, N., and Barthlott, W. (2000). Food composition of aquatic bladderworts (Utricularia, Lentibulariaceae) in various habitats. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 72, 1–13.

Google Scholar

Płachno, B. J., Adamec, L., and Kamińska, I. (2015). Relationship between trap anatomy and function in Australian carnivorous bladderworts (Utricularia) of the subgenus Polypompholyx. Aquat. Bot. 120, 290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.09.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Płachno, B. J., Kamińska, I., Adamec, L., and Świątek, P. (2017). Vascular tissue in traps of Australian carnivorous bladderworts (Utricularia) of the subgenus Polypompholyx. Aquat. Bot. 142, 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2017.06.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Płachno, B. J., Łukaszek, M., Wołowski, K., Adamec, L., and Stolarczyk, P. (2012). Aging of Utricularia traps and variability of microorganisms associated with that microhabitat. Aquat. Bot. 97, 44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Płachno, B. J., and Muravnik, L. E. (2018). “Chapter 13. Functional anatomy of carnivorous traps” in Carnivorous plants: Physiology, ecology, and evolution. eds. A. M. Ellison and L. Adamec (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 167–179. ISBN: 978019877984

Google Scholar

Płachno, B. J., Wołowski, K., Fleischmann, F., Lowrie, A., and Łukaszek, M. (2014). Algae and prey associated with traps of the Australian carnivorous plant Utricularia volubilis (Lentibulariaceae, Utricularia subgenus Polypompholyx) in natural habitat and in cultivation. Aust. J. Bot. 62, 528–536. doi: 10.1071/BT14176

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poppinga, S., Daber, L. E., Westermeier, A. S., Kruppert, S., Horstmann, M., Tollrian, R., et al. (2017). Biomechanical analysis of prey capture in the carnivorous Southern bladderwort (Utricularia australis). Sci. Rep. 7:1776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01954-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poppinga, S., Masselter, T., and Speck, T. (2013). Faster than their prey: new insights into the rapid movements of active carnivorous plants traps. BioEssays 35, 649–657. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poppinga, S., Weisskopf, C., Westermeier, A. S., Masselter, T., and Speck, T. (2016). Fastest predators in the plant kingdom: functional morphology and biomechanics of suction traps found in the largest genus of carnivorous plants. AoB Plants 8:plv140. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reifenrath, K., Theisen, I., Schnitzler, J., Porembski, S., and Barthlott, W. (2006). Trap architecture in carnivorous Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae). Flora 201, 597–605. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2005.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reynolds, E. S. (1963). The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electronopaque stain for electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richter, U. (1990). Die Fangblasen von Utricularia cf. praelonga St.Hil. und Utricularia dichotoma Lab.–eine rasterelektronische Untersuchung. Flora 184, 21–30. doi: 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)31582-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigues, F. G., Marulanda, N. F., Silva, S. R., Płachno, B. J., Adamec, L., and Miranda, V. F. O. (2017). Phylogeny of the “orchid-like” bladderworts (gen. Utricularia sect. Orchidioides and Iperua: Lentibulariaceae) with remarks on the stolon-tuber system. Ann. Bot. 120, 709–723. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, S. R., Gibson, R., Adamec, L., Domínguez, Y., and Miranda, V. F. O. (2018). Molecular phylogeny of bladderworts: a wide approach of Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae) species relationships based on six plastidial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 118, 244–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.10.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sirová, D., Bárta, J., Borovec, J., and Vrba, J. (2018). “The Utricularia-associated microbiome: composition, function, and ecology” in Carnivorous plants: Physiology, ecology, and evolution. eds. A. M. Ellison and L. Adamec (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 349–358. ISBN: 9780198779841

Google Scholar

Sirová, D., Borovec, J., Černá, B., Rejmánková, E., Adamec, L., and Vrba, J. (2009). Microbial community development in the traps of aquatic Utricularia species. Aquat. Bot. 90, 129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.07.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Taylor, P. (1989). The Genus Utricularia: A Taxonomic Monograph. Kew Bulletin, Additional Series, XIV.

Google Scholar

Thurston, E. L., and Seabury, F. (1975). A scanning electron microscopic study of the utricle trichomes in Utricularia biflora Lam. Bot. Gaz. 136, 87–93. doi: 10.1086/336786

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vincent, O., and Marmottant, P. (2011). Carnivorous Utricularia: the buckling scenario. Plant Signal. Behav. 6, 1752–1754. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.11.17804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vincent, O., Roditchev, I., and Marmottant, P. (2011a). Spontaneous firings of carnivorous aquatic Utricularia traps: temporal patterns and mechanical oscillations. PLoS One 6:e20205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vincent, O., Weißkopf, C., Poppinga, S., Masselter, T., Speck, T., Joyeux, M., et al. (2011b). Ultra-fast underwater suction traps. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 2909–2914. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2292

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Westermeier, A. S., Fleischmann, A., Müller, K., Schäferhoff, B., Rubach, C., Speck, T., et al. (2017). Trap diversity and character evolution in carnivorous bladderworts (Utricularia, Lentibulariaceae). Sci. Rep. 7:12052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12324-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: carnivorous plants, Utricularia, trap, functional morphology, functional anatomy, Bivalvaria, Polypompholyx

Citation: Płachno BJ, Świątek P, Miranda VFO and Stolarczyk P (2019) The Structure and Occurrence of a Velum in Utricularia Traps (Lentibulariaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 10:302. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00302

Received: 18 October 2018; Accepted: 25 February 2019;
Published: 22 March 2019.

Edited by:

Simon Poppinga, University of Freiburg, Germany

Reviewed by:

Lubomir Adamec, Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czechia
Rolf Rutishauser, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Ulrike K. Muller, California State University, Fresno, United States

Copyright © 2019 Płachno, Świątek, Miranda and Stolarczyk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bartosz J. Płachno, bartosz.plachno@uj.edu.pl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.