Junkyard Find: 1986 GMC S-15 Jimmy 4X4

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

GM sold Isuzu Faster pickups with Chevrolet LUV badging in North America from 1972 through 1982, replacing that Japanese truck with the all-Detroit S-10 starting in that final LUV year. An SUV-ized version of the S-10 ( the S-10 Blazer) followed for the 1983 model year, and a GMC-badged twin known as the S-15 Jimmy went along with it. Here's one of those first-generation mini-Jimmies, found in a self-service yard near Sacramento, California.

Just to confuse everyone, Chevrolet and GMC were already selling much larger, unrelated trucks called the Blazer and Jimmy at the time, but Ford had gotten away with selling two unrelated cars with LTD badges in the late 1970s, so why not take advantage of existing name recognition?

Technically speaking, the four-wheel-drive version of this truck was known as the T-15 Jimmy (but all GMC marketing materials appear to use the S-15 name for the whole family of trucks).

Meanwhile, the big Jimmy and little Jimmy got fender badges that differed somewhat from each other. I'm just sad that GMC dropped the classy Gentleman Jim and Beau James packages years before (though you could retrofit an S-15 Jimmy with reproduction Gentleman Jim decals if necessary).

Just 136,173 miles on this truck. The early S-10 gauge cluster is a masterpiece of cheap-yet-functional design.

Unfortunately, GM made a lot of cheap-but-easily-broken hood-release rigs in their 1980s vehicles, so I couldn't get photos of the 2.8-liter V6 under the hood. That engine was rated at 125 horsepower.

The base engine for 1986 was the 2.5-liter Iron Duke four-cylinder.

A rear-wheel-drive version was available, as was a five-speed manual transmission, but this truck has the most common 4WD/automatic configuration.

All-wheel-drive mania had not yet consumed America, so this 4WD system was the real thing.

This AM/FM/cassette radio cost $344 extra (about $935 in 2022 dollars), but was necessary for full appreciation of the fine music of the era.

The price for a 1986 S-15 Jimmy 4x4 with V6 engine and automatic transmission started at $11,928, or about $32,435 after inflation.

If you wanted air conditioning, that cost another 705 bucks (1,915 bucks today).

Production of the first-generation S-10 Blazer/S-15 Jimmy continued through 1994, despite being primitive and harsh-riding compared to the new crop of suburban-commute SUVs beginning to dominate American-market vehicle sales.

A four-door version with a stretched wheelbase didn't become available until the 1991 model year.

Colorado demands shift-on-the-fly four-wheel-drive and electronic fuel injection.

Meanwhile, Wisconsin Jimmy owners could haul the boat out of the lake before heading to the fish boil.

[Images by the author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Ribbedroof Ribbedroof on Nov 24, 2022

    Had an '87 Blazer 2.8 4x4 in '92.....it was great when it snowed, you just floored it and went. Didn't make enough power to spin a tire. Merging onto the Interstate was another matter entirely, and that was before the chaos that is today's traffic

  • Nrd515 Nrd515 on Nov 26, 2022

    I bought an '88 S10 Blazer with the 4.3. We had it 4 years and put just about 48K on it with a bunch of trips to Nebraska and S. Dakota to see relatives. It had a couple of minor issues when new, a piece of trim fell off the first day, and it had a seriously big oil leak soon after we got it. The amazinly tiny starter failed at about 40K, it was fixed under some sort of secret warranty and we got a new Silverado as a loaner. Other than that, and a couple of tires that blew when I ran over some junk on the road, it was a rock. I hated the dash instrumentation, and being built like a gorilla, it was about an inch and a half too narrow for my giant shoulders, but it drove fine, and was my second most trouble free vehicle ever, only beaten by my '82 K5 Blazer, which had zero issues for nearly 50K miles. We sold the S10 to a friend, who had it over 20 years and over 400,000 miles on the original short block! It had a couple of transmissions, a couple of valve jobs, a rear end rebuild at 300K, was stolen and vandalized twice, cut open like a tin can when a diabetic truck driver passed out(We were all impressed at the lack of rust inside the rear quarters at almost 10 years old, and it just went on and on. Ziebart did a good job on that Blazer. All three of his sons learned to drive in it, and it was only sent to the boneyard when the area above the windshield had rusted to the point it was like taking a shower when it rained. He now has a Jeep that he's put a ton of money into. He says he misses the S10's reliablity a lot these days, the Jeep is in the shop a lot.

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next